Support articles

I have a Validation > Model > Loads > “Temperature load defined on rigid diaphragm” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > Loads > “Temperature load defined on rigid diaphragm” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer A Temperature load defined on rigid diaphragm validation warning occurs when you have applied a temperature load to a slab panel but the slab panel is defined as a diaphragm with the Diaphragm option set to “Rigid”. If you hover over the Temperature load defined on rigid diaphragm validation warning or an item within the folder branch a tooltip advises “A temperature loading is applied to an area of rigid diaphragm - no effect will
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-Loads
  • validation
  • warning
  • Temperature load defined on rigid diaphragm

I have a Validation > Model > Loads > “Temperature load defined to non-meshed slab” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > Loads > “Temperature load defined to non-meshed slab” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer If you hover over the Temperature load defined to non-meshed slab validation warning or a temperature load listed within the folder branch a tooltip advises “A temperature loading is applied to a slab which is not modelled in the 3D analysis - no effect will be seen in model”. This validation warning occurs if a temperature load is applied to a slab and the 2-way slab is not meshed in the 3D analysis. This is because there are no
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • validation
  • warning
  • Validation-Model-Loads
  • Temperature loads defined to non-meshed slab

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Beam centre-line is outside slab plane / boundary” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Beam centre-line is outside slab plane / boundary” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer A Beam centre-line is outside slab plane / boundary validation warning occurs if you have adjusted the alignment of the beam such that the centre-line of the beam is now located outside the slab boundary. If we hover over the Beam centre-line is outside slab plane / boundary validation warning or an item listed within the branch, a tooltip is displayed “Beam will not receive slab loads, consider changing alignment”. Hence,
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
5
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning
  • Beam centre-line is outside slab plane / boundary

I have a Validation > Analysis > FE chase-down > “Pattern load status not defined” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question Following an analysis or design I have a Validation > Analysis > FE chase-down > “Pattern load status not defined” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer If we hover over one of the problem items a tooltip is displayed “No panels have been set as unloaded in this pattern case”. This means that you have opted to consider pattern loading by checking the option “Patten load” in the Load ribbon > Loadcases dialog but you have not looked at the loaded/unloaded arrangement of slab panels to define the patterns you wish to consider for this load case. All
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • validation
  • warning
  • Pattern load status not defined

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Alignment offset” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Alignment offset” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer An Alignment offset validation warning occurs if you have defined the physical geometry of the section such that the alignment wire (insertion line) does not lie within the cross section. It would be useful to refer you to the Member Connectivity topic within the Analysis section of the Tekla Structural Designer Help system at this point for you to gain an understanding of how the analysis model is constructed and an appreciation of the alignment wire (
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
3
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning
  • Alignment offset

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Effective width is greater than automatically calculated value” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Effective width is greater than automatically calculated value” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer When defining a composite beam the effective width is automatically calculated in accordance with the respective Head code rules. It is possible following model geometry edits i.e increasing or reducing the composite beam span or the spacing between parallel beams - that the value is greater than the code requirement. When this occurs the validation warning is provided to you as shown in the first screenshot
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning
  • Effective width is greater than automatically calculated value

I have a Validation > Model > Loads > “Decomposition to multiple diaphragms” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > Loads > “Decomposition to multiple diaphragms” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer A Decomposition to multiple diaphragms validation warning occurs when more than one diaphragm is identified on the same level and the second smaller diaphragm is greater than 5% of the wind profile width. The tooltip indicates this to you when you hover over Decomposition to multiple diaphragms or any problem simple wind load item listed within the branch. You can double click the Decomposition to multiple diaphragms or individual simple
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-Loads
  • validation
  • warning
  • Decomposition to multiple diaphragm

Tekla Structural Designer 2018 Service Pack 2

This release will upgrade your Tekla Structural Designer installation to version number 18.0.2.05 and should be installed to ensure optimum function of the program.   It includes a number of significant new features together with several enhancements and issue resolutions as detailed below.  If you are upgrading from a version earlier than Tekla Structural Designer 2018 Service Pack 1 (version 18.0.1.10) you can find details of enhancements and fixes included in all previous releases in Tekla User Assistance (TUA) and Tekla Downloads via the links below: Tekla User Assistance Main version
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
5

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Invalid member group” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General> “Invalid member group” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer An Invalid member group validation warning occurs when members exist in the same group but they no longer meet the group rules. The tooltip indicates this to you when you hover over Invalid member group or any problem element listed within the branch. Elements can be grouped for design. This is controlled via the Design ribbon tab > Design Options > Design groups page. By default concrete beams and columns are grouped for design. For further
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
2
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning
  • Invalid Member Group

When I try to create a drawing via the Draw ribbon or right click context menu "Generate detailed drawing", the model crashes. Why is this and how can I resolve it?

Question When I try to create a drawing via the Draw ribbon or right click context menu "Generate detailed drawing", the model crashes. Why is this and how can I resolve it?     Answer When you create a drawing in Tekla Structural Designer it first generates the drawing and saves it as a .dxf file in the chosen file location. Once the dxf file is saved, Tekla Structural Designer then opens the application that is associated with the DXF file. Autodesk uses AcLauncher.exe to control file associations and if there is a problem with this then the application cannot be found and an exception
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
5
  • DXF
  • Create
  • drawing

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Discontinuous wall supported by unmeshed slab” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Discontinuous wall supported by unmeshed slab” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer By default a slab is replaced with a diaphragm in the 3D Building analysis (First-Order linear analysis). This means that the wall intended to be supported by the slab is unsupported.   If we hover over one of the problem items a tooltip is displayed “Where a discontinuous wall is supported by a slab, the slab must be meshed in the 3D building analysis and Grillage chase-down.” We can double click the “Discontinuous wall
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning
  • Discontinuous wall supported by unmeshed slab

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Opening in slab above member” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Opening in slab above member” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer An Opening in slab above member validation warning occurs if you have defined an opening in a slab that cuts into a concrete member. Tekla Structural Designer will allow you to place an opening anywhere on a slab - this includes cutting into a member, however, no account is taken of this. There is no reduction in the column/beam/wall section area to account for the opening. Because of this, Tekla Structural Designer warns about it - it is then
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning
  • Opening in slab above member

I have a Validation > Model > Diaphragms > “Rigid diaphragms on sloping slabs” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > Diaphragms > “Rigid diaphragms on sloping slabs” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer A rigid diaphragm on sloping slabs validation error occurs when a slab is defined on a sloped plane and the Diaphragm option is set to Rigid. Rigid diaphragms have infinite in-plane stiffness and zero out of plane stiffness properties and therefore they neither exhibit membrane deformation nor report the associated forces. When a rigid diaphragm is specified, nodal constraints are automatically applied to all nodes within the diaphragm
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • validation
  • error
  • Rigid diaphragm on sloping slabs

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Raised support provides lateral restraint” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Raised support provides lateral restraint” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Note. This is a new validation warning introduced in Tekla Structrual Designer 2018. Prior versions did not flag this issue to your attention. Answer A raised support is a support that occurs on a higher (raised) level than the lowest support in the model. A couple of situations where this warning can arise are listed below: Where we have multiple foundation levels in the model. Where we are trying to model support from an adjacent
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
3.5
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning
  • Raised support

I have a Validation > Model > Supports > “Support clashing with member length” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > Supports > “Support clashing with member length” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer If we hover over one of the problem supports a tooltip is displayed “A support has been defined at a position other than the base of a column/wall - review model” We can double click the “Support clashing with member length” warning or an individual support listed under the branch to highlight the supports or support in the model. Alternatively, you can right click the item and choose Highlight Items from the context menu. The supports
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-General
  • Support clashing with member length
  • validation
  • warning

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Invalid natural frequency effective width” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Invalid natural frequency effective width” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer This validation error will appear alongside an "Invalid effective width" error. The resolution for both is the same so please refer to the article I have a Validation > Model > General > “Invalid effective width” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-General
  • Invalid Natural Frequency Effective Width
  • validation
  • error

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Invalid effective width” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Invalid effective width” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer In the screenshot below two beams have been identified as having an invalid effective width issue. Beam 1 is defined as a beam of Construction "Composite beam", however, the slab that is placed on the beam is not a slab of Type "Composite slab" and hence the error. The slab above the composite beam needs to be a composite slab so that the data of the two objects can interact together. Alternatively, the beam needs to be Construction "Non-composite
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
4
  • Validation-Model-General
  • Invalid Effective Width
  • validation
  • error

I have a Validation > Model > General > “Grid is not quite aligned with building directions” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Model > General > “Grid is not quite aligned with building directions” warning. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?   Answer You specify the Building Directions for the model. These by default follow the global X and Y directions, but can be set via the Project Workspace > Structure window by selecting the Structure branch. See the linked article in the right pane for further information on Building directions.   The warning will result if a gridline is placed into the model which is less than 0.01 degrees out of alignment with the Building
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Model-General
  • validation
  • warning

Tekla Portal Frame Designer 18 & Tekla Connection Designer 18 Service Pack 1

This release will upgrade your Tekla Portal Frame Designer & Tekla Connection Designer installation to version number 18.0.1.0 and should be installed to ensure optimum function of the program.   Licensing & Installation Licensing - no new license is required for this version. Installation - this service pack requires Tekla Portal Frame Designer 18 & Tekla Connection Designer 18 to be installed and will upgrade this to version 18.0.1.0. New Features Tekla Connection Designer Splice connections can now be designed and exported from Tekla Structural Designer. Please note this new
by Martin Roclawski
1

I have a Validation > Analysis > General > “Material Poisson’s ratio is invalid for 2D elements (0 < v < 0.5)” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it?

Question I have a Validation > Analysis > General > “Material Poisson’s ratio is invalid for 2D elements (0 < v < 0.5)” error. Why do I get this and how do I resolve it? Answer Tekla Structural Designer uses the theory of isotropic linear elasticity so the modulus of elasticity, E is related to the shear modulus, G by way of Poisson's ratio, v. Poisson’s ratio is the ratio of lateral strain to longitudinal strain in a material subjected to loading. The Poisson's ratio for a wide range of materials fall within a lower limit of -1.0 and an upper limit of +0.5. Since most common
Requires Tekla Maintenance
by Tekla Structural Designer Development Team
0
  • Validation-Analysis
  • Poisson Ratio
  • validation
  • error

Pages